|
|
|
|
Enfield
0208 804 0478 |
Woking 01483 797901 |
Archives >Winter 2003 Bulletin |
||||
|
||||
PARENTS TO THE RESCUEWhat
with student loans and easy consumer credit, these days many young adults
suddenly find themselves with serious debt problems. Sometimes the debts just
grow until they reach critical mass; sometimes a crisis is triggered by
redundancy, reduced earnings or a relationship breakdown. Parents may want to
help their children through a difficult time, but they should not simply offer
to pay the most pressing creditors. By adopting a more businesslike approach,
they can maximise the benefit obtained from the contribution they are willing to
make. The
first step must be to establish the facts – all the facts. There is no point
in repaying debts of £10,000 if other creditors are owed £20,000 and one of
them will petition for bankruptcy if he is not paid. Very often, the smallest
creditors are the least patient and most dangerous: after all, the mortgagee has
security and official Student Loans are repaid through the tax system, but the
only hope a finance or credit card company may have of collecting its money is
to take legal action. Once
the facts are established, it may be that the parents are able and willing to
repay enough of their son’s or daughter’s short-term, high-interest consumer
debt to resolve the immediate crisis and leave him or her able to manage
long-term liabilities, such as mortgage and student loan repayments. On the
other hand, they may have £10,000 available and £30,000 of high-interest debt
to repay. The
general rule of law, in England and Wales, is that an agreement to accept less
than the full amount owing is not legally binding. (The position in Scotland is
different, but someone living in Scotland may still find that his credit card
agreement is governed by English law.) However, there are a number of exceptions
to this general rule, one of which is that if a third party offers a reduced sum
‘in full and final settlement’, and the creditor accepts, then the agreement
is legally binding. This principle was, in fact, established by a series of
nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Court cases concerning fathers who
settled their sons’ debts to moneylenders. The
worse the son’s or daughter’s financial problems, the stronger the
parents’ bargaining position as they can say, politely of course, ‘take what
I am offering or be satisfied with nothing’. When house prices slumped in the
1990s, it was not unusual for parents to settle their children’s negative
equity for less than ten per cent of the total amount outstanding. Creditors are
pragmatic people and know that the alternative may be to write off the debt, or
sell it for a few pence in the pound to a collection agency. Finally,
be aware that many debt advice services charge high fees or are really in the
business of selling ‘consolidation loans’ – a new loan to repay existing
debts. They may even recommend remortgaging the parents’ home to repay the
son’s or daughter’s debts, which is unlikely to be a good idea. If
someone in your family has serious debt problems – however they arose –
please contact us for a confidential discussion. There is an old saying, that a
debtor is like a donkey in a quagmire, but it should be possible to find a rope
to pull him out!
| ||||
| W Accountancy Limited is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales |
| Copyright W Accountancy Ltd 2006, All rights reserved. |