W Accountancy Limited - Chartered Acountants

Accountancy in Enfield and Woking

                 Enfield  0208 804 0478

Woking  01483 797901

 

Archives >

Summer 2003 Newsletter

 

Content

What cash says about you
Schedule E is dead
Flat Rate Scheme
Business in the house
TIGER, TIGER, burning bright
Buyer beware
A question of interest
Is it a car? Is it a heap?
Retire to a safe distance
Paternity leave
Off the back of a lorry?
Partners in crime
You can't have it both ways
Two's company
Options Open
Tax credit chaos
Congestion Charging
Landlord's delight
Stamp Duty splits
Another PAYE year
IR35 strikes again
Simpler by the year
Ain't necessarily so
Elementary deductions
New rules for goods
Sell low, buy high?
Pension problems

 

Elementary deductions

It is unlawful to make an 'unauthorised deduction' from an employee's pay. Deductions are authorised if they are required by law (such as PAYE) or if they are agreed in writing with the employee, for example in the employment contract, or by special agreement.

It's important to be aware of this if you want to reduce payments for some reason. In a recent case, an employer implemented short-time working, and simply reduced the employees' pay accordingly. The employees protested, and it was held to be an unauthorised deduction because it was not dealt with in writing in the employment contract. It may seem 'obvious' to the employer that less work means less pay, but employees have a right to their contractual pay unless the contract says otherwise.

In another case, an employer gave the employees certain health benefits, including the payment of sick pay for an extended period. The employer took out a group permanent health insurance policy to cover this. The problem arose because the employer's staff booklet appeared to be more generous than the insurance company's policy - an employee was paid under the policy for two years, but then was held to be capable of doing some work, and the insurer stopped paying. The employer's handbook suggested that sick pay would continue as long as the employee could not do his original job. The employer had to carry on with the sick pay, even though it was not covered by insurance, because anything else would be an unauthorised deduction.

The case is Jowitt v Pioneer Technology (UK) Ltd, and it is written up in Accountancy, April 2003 p120.

 
W Accountancy Limited is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Copyright W Accountancy Ltd 2006, All rights reserved.